House Bill 97 was introduced into the Wyoming House Labor Health and Social Services committee yesterday by Representative Kendell Kroeker (R-Evansville). The committee debated for over two hours before rejecting the bill. Many representatives cited legal and medical vagueness as a reason to reject the bill. Representative Mary Throne (D-Cheyenne) questioned “Is this abortion illegal at 22 days with a highly invasive ultrasound or is it illegal at 9 weeks when we hear a heartbeat with a stethoscope?” Republican Representative Norine Kasperik (Gillette) pointed out that during the discussion she also heard different answers for when a heartbeat is detectable. Kasperik said, “These are questions that I feel like I have not heard answers to and have concerns about the vagueness of some of the language within the bill.”
Representative Sue Wallis (R-Recluse) shared her own abortion story, which happened when she was facing both a difficult pregnancy and a custody battle for her three children against an abusive ex-husband. “The notion that protected human life begins at the moment of conception is some religious sects’ interpretation, certainly not mine” she declared.
Wyoming is not the only state that has considered a ban on abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected. The Ohio state legislature faced the same decision last year when a heartbeat bill passed the Ohio House of Representatives, but expired in the state Senate without being brought to the floor.
Media Resources: Casper Star-Tribune 1/29/2013; San Francisco Chronicle 1/28/2013; Feminist Newswire 11/28/2012
Shabby Wyoming flag, closeup background from Shutterstock
Latest posts by Feminist Newswire (see all)
- Obama Administration Issues New Rule to Strengthen Response to Campus Sexual Violence - October 21, 2014
- Hulu Silences Rape Survivor Speaking Out Against Anti-Abortion Amendment 67 in Colorado - October 21, 2014
- Afghanistan’s New First Lady Advances Women’s Issues - October 21, 2014