The law would have redefined marriage as the legal union of two people, not specifically a man and a woman. It would also have converted civil unions to marriages within a year’s time. Religious institutions and individuals that oppose homosexuality would not be required to perform marriage ceremonies for same-sex couples. The bill passed the state Senate in February with a vote of 32 to 21.
However, in the House, the bill failed to gain enough support to pass. As a result, the bill’s sponsor Representative Greg Harris (D-Chicago) announced that he would not bring the bill up for a vote. He said before the chamber, “And I’ve never been sadder to accept this request, but I have to keep my eye, as we all must, on the ultimate prize. They’ve asked for time to go back to their districts, talk to their constituents and reach out to their minds and hearts and have told me they’ll return in November with their word that they’re prepared to support this legislation.” He continued, “We will be back and we will be voting on this bill in this legislature, in this room… Until that day, I apologize to the families who were hoping to wake up tomorrow as full and equal citizens of this state.”
If passed, Illinois would have become the 13th state to legalize same-sex marriage. The Minnesota state legislature voted to approve same-sex marriage in mid-May, shortly after Rhode Island and Delaware.
Media Resources: Associated Press 6/1/2013; Chicago Sun-Times 5/31/2013; Reuters 5/31/2013; Feminist Newswire 5/14/2013, 2/15/2013
Raster gay wedding rings on rainbow path from Shutterstock
Latest posts by Feminist Newswire (see all)
- Houston Is Finally Testing a Backlog of Thirty-Year-Old Rape Kits - February 27, 2015
- This Bipartisan Bill Will Hold Colleges Accountable for Ending Campus Sexual Assault - February 27, 2015
- If This Bill Passes, Federal Law Will Mandate Consent Education in Public Schools - February 26, 2015