Founding Feminists is FMF’s daily herstory column.
Pennsylvania suffragists have never lacked determination, and today their persistence paid off, as the House passed a bill – by an almost two to one margin – to put a suffrage referendum on the State ballot in 1921.
“Votes for Women” advocates in the Keystone State never gave up after the 1915 suffrage referendum went down to defeat along with referenda in three other big Eastern States that Fall. They have been hard at work ever since, and have greatly increased the public’s support for equal suffrage in Pennsylvania, so once the Senate has passed the bill and the Governor has signed it, the referendum is expected to easily pass.
But the proposed Pennsylvania Suffrage Referendum of 1921 is just one small part of the reason why optimism abounds among suffragists. Just yesterday, Iowa became the eighth State in three months whose legislatures have passed bills enabling women to vote for President. Though only partial victories, in that women do not yet have full voting rights in these newly-won States, the fact that women can now vote for President in 27 of the 48 States, which have a combined total of 302 Electoral Votes out of the 531 which will be cast, means that regardless of whether the Susan B. Anthony (nationwide woman suffrage) Amendment is passed and ratified in time to assure full voting rights for women in all States in the 1920 election, women’s votes will be critical to Presidential candidates in the next – and all future – elections.
Leaders of the National American Woman Suffrage Association are confident that the addition of Iowa, Indiana, Maine, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin, Tennessee and Vermont (if the Governor’s veto is not sustained by the courts) as Presidential suffrage States will be enough to pressure Congress into passing the Anthony Amendment. The members of the new Congress will represent 15 States in which women vote on the same basis as men, 12 in which they have Presidential suffrage, and 29 States in which women have some form of local suffrage (some of which are the same States in which they have Presidential suffrage) and two States in which women can vote in party primaries.
There are now about 15,500,000 women eligible to vote for the next President – a number just 2,000,000 less that the total number of votes actually cast for the two major party candidates in the 1916 Presidential election. The West has only one State – New Mexico – where women cannot vote for President, and even the “Solid South” has cracked a bit, as Tennessee women will be able to help elect the nation’s next Chief Executive.
The 66th Congress will be back in session on May 19th, and it is expected that the House will once again pass the Anthony Amendment, doing so by a comfortable margin and almost immediately. Polls from various suffrage groups show uncertainly over whether there are precisely enough votes in the Senate, or whether one vote is still lacking for the required 2/3 majority. But the sudden rush of support for Presidential suffrage by the legislatures of so many States can only add to the pressure on Senators to vote for the Anthony Amendment. Then it’s on to the States, where 36 of 48 are required to ratify. Though there will be no deadline for ratification, every effort will be made to achieve it in time for women to register for the 1920 election.
Latest posts by David Dismore (see all)
- Today in Herstory: New York Women Are Determined to Vote, At Any Cost - December 18, 2014
- Today in Herstory: America’s Feminist Leaders Declare Solidarity With the Queer Liberation Movement - December 17, 2014
- Today in Herstory: Suffragists Protest Wilson on the Boston Tea Party Anniversary - December 16, 2014