Search Feminist News by keyword
A Tennessee state court last week broke away from a tide of court rulings in favor of marriage equality by upholding the state's ban on recognizing same-sex marriages legally performed elsewhere.
In a broadly worded decision, state court judge Russell Simmons, Jr. ruled that the Tennessee Anti-Recognition Law, which prohibits recognition of same-sex marriages, did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.
Writing that "neither the Federal Government nor another state should be allowed to dictate to Tennessee what has traditionally been a state's responsibility," Judge Simmons appeared to be signaling his belief in the constitutionality of the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriages more generally.
In making his decision, Judge Simmons found that the US Supreme Court decision in US v. Windsor, finding Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional, did not offer any guidance with respect to Tennessee's state definition of marriage or its obligation to recognize, or not, same-sex marriages performed in other states.
"In the Windsor case the Supreme Court opines that if a state finds same-sex marriage to be valid, the Federal Government cannot trump that State's law," he wrote. "The Supreme Court did not go the final step and find that a State that defines marriages as a union of one (1) man and one (1) woman is unconstitutional. Further, the Supreme Court does not find that one State's refusal to accept as valid another State's valid same-sex marriage to be in violation of the U.S. Constitution."
Judge Simmons agreed that marriage is a fundamental right, but stated that "the battle is not between whether or not marriage is a fundamental right but what unions are included in the definition of "marriage."
The fight for marriage equality in Tennessee does not end with Judge Simmons. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit last week heard, along with challenges to bans in Kentucky, Michigan, and Ohio, a federal challenge to the Tennessee's failure to recognize legally performed same-sex marriages. A decision in that case is expected later this year.
This Thursday, a National Moment of Silence will be held in cities across the country to remember the lives lost and impacted by police brutality. In the wake of two deadly police-involved shootings in less than a week, online activist Feminista Jones and individual Twitter followers were able to coordinate the event in a single day.
Mounting tension over increased acts of deadly force by law enforcement agencies across the country brimmed over this weekend, following only the most recent deaths at the hands of police officers.
Last Wednesday, the Dayton Daily News first reported the shooting death of 22-year-old John Crawford by police at an Ohio WalMart. Ronald Ritchie, another shopper, called 911 after seeing Crawford with an air gun in the store. LeeCee Johnson, the mother of Crawford's children, told the Dayton Daily News she was on the phone with Crawford when he was killed. "He said he was at the video games playing videos and he went over there by the toy section where the toy guns were. And the next thing I know, he said, 'It's not real,' and the police start shooting and they said 'Get on the ground,' but he was already on the ground because they had shot him."
Saturday, 18-year-old Michael Brown was killed following, what St. Louis County Police said, was a physical altercation between Brown and the officer. The unarmed teen was shot multiple times by local police. He was slated to begin classes at Vatterott College in Missouri on Monday. Hundreds of residents in Ferguson built a small memorial outside of a news conference updating the details of Brown's death, but images of overnight riots dominated mainstream news coverage of the community's response. Critics of the coverage took to social media, comparing the photos of destruction in Ferguson to racist coverage of other major news events, and unflattering images of the deceased to the photos circulated following the death of Trayvon Martin.
In a statement issued by the St. Louis NAACP, Cornell William Brooks, President and CEO said, "The death of yet another African-American at the hands of those sworn to protect and serve the community where he lived is heartbreaking. Michael Brown was preparing to begin college, and now his family is preparing to bury their child - his life cut short in a tragic encounter with the police." The organization will lead a local vigil in Missouri today, but Brooks called on the community to act "collectively and calmly" while the state and national branches pursued further investigation of the incident.
The #NMOS14 organizers hope Thursday's event will provide some means to channel still-raw emotions. "People are hurting right now. People are angry. People are seeking understanding and compassion," Feminista Jones said in a tweet yesterday. "It is a small gesture (in my opinion) but one that could tangibly unify us, ALL of us, as a launching pad for further action," she said.
The event will also acknowledge other victims of police brutality, including the recent choking death of Eric Garner in New York City at the hands of the NYPD. Garner was unarmed when police attempted to arrest him on suspicion of selling untaxed, loose cigarettes.
Still, many hope the outrage over the use of excessive force extends to African American women recently attacked by police. In July, a 51-year-old homeless grandmother, Marlene Pinnock, was brutally beaten by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer. In the video, the CHP officer is seen repeatedly punching Pinnock in the head as she lay on the ground. Just last week, cell phone video began circulating of NYPD officers ruthlessly dragging a naked 48-year-old Brooklyn grandmother out of her apartment. According to news reports, the officers were at the wrong residence, but neighbors can be heard shouting for a female officer to intervene.
8/11/2014 - France Dumps Abortion Restrictions, Will Cover the Cost of All First Trimester Abortions
A new law in France will now allow first-trimester abortions without requiring women to prove a justification for needing the procedure.
The new law, proposed by the French Minister for Women's Rights Najat Vallaud-Belkacem was promulgated last Tuesday. It amends the country's current law, which allows abortion only if a pregnant women can prove "distress." The new law also bans any attempt to restrict women from getting information about abortion services.
The French National Assembly voted to approve the new law in January amid heated controversy. At that time, Vallaud-Belkacem defended the change to the current law, saying Abortion is a right in itself and not something that is simply tolerated depending on the conditions." Under a law passed in 2012, the French government must pay 100 percent of the cost of an abortion from the social security budget. During the debate on the new abortion law, French lawmakers tried unsuccessfully to repeal the funding requirement. The 2012 law also allows adolescents between 15-18 years old to obtain certain contraceptives for free at family planning centers.
The new abortion law is part of a package of proposed gender equality measures to extend paternity leave, promote sex equality at work, decrease sex stereotyping in media, and provide increased support to low-income women and survivors of domestic abuse.
"At a time when women in many parts of the world, including in the United States and Spain, are seeing their rights restricted, violated, and disrespected, France has set an important example for the rest of the globe with its progressive stance toward reproductive health care," said Lilian Sepulveda, Director of the Global Legal Program for the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Ensuring a woman's right to control her fertility is fundamental to achieving gender equality. But passing today's law is just the first step - we now look to French policymakers to ensure women see the benefits of this historic law implemented this year."
In the United States, women have a constitutionally protected right to abortion, but restrictions on abortion access vary from state to state. An explosion of Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider (TRAP) laws has also limited access to abortion, by forcing comprehensive women's reproductive health clinics to close.
Affordability is also a continuing obstacle for some women to obtain an abortion. Most women in the US pay out-of-pocket for the procedure. The availability of private insurance coverage for abortion now varies from state to state, and since 1976, the federal government has withheld funds for abortion coverage in most circumstances. State and federal restrictions on abortion coverage have had a disproportion impact on low-income women, women of color, immigrant women, and the young. The lack of affordable access for abortions in the US has lead to a significant gap between low-income women who carry to term an unintended pregnancy versus wealthier women who do. Of those under the federal poverty level, unintended pregnancies that ended in birth went up 11 percent between 2001 and 2008.
While women in the US wait for better and more affordable access to abortion services, France's new law could go into effect as early as 2015.
A federal judge on Friday refused to grant civil rights groups and the US Department of Justice a preliminary injunction against a North Carolina voter suppression measure, signed into law by Republican Governor Pat McCrory last year. The law will now take effect for the November 2014 general election while the groups' three consolidated lawsuits are pending.
The ruling by US District Court Judge Thomas D. Schroeder, nominated by President George W. Bush, allows four provisions of the North Carolina voter suppression law, HB 589, to remain in effect: the shortening of the early voting period, the elimination of same-day voter registration during the early-voting period, a prohibition on counting provisional ballots cast by voters in their home county but outside their home voting precinct, and the termination of a preregistration program for 16- and 17-year-olds. The voter identification portion of the law was not specifically at issue in this ruling since it does not take effect until 2016.
"The right to vote lies at the hear of our democracy," said Rev. Dr. William J. Barber, President of the North Carolina NAACP. "Our movement against this voter suppression law is built on the legacy of those who have testified before us, with their feet and blood, to fight for equal rights in North Carolina and the nation. We will not falter in our efforts to mobilize until this extreme law is repealed."
In his decision, Judge Schroeder found that the plaintiffs - which included the North Carolina NAACP, the League of Women Voters of North Carolina, the A. Philip Randolph Institute, and many others - did not meet the burden for a preliminary injunction, but that the case should not be dismissed outright, as the state of North Carolina had urged the court to do. A full trial, also dealing with the voter ID provision, is scheduled for next year.
Voter suppression laws like the one enacted in North Carolina after the US Supreme Court's decision in Shelby v. Holder, specifically target voters of color as well as low-income voters, women, and the elderly. North Carolina's voter identification provision is particularly restrictive for college students because student identification cards (including those issued by state-run universities) and out-of-state driver's license will not be accepted - although military and veteran identification cards will be. African-American voters, Hispanic voters, and voters over age 65 are also less likely to have a government issued photo id, according to a study by the Brennan Center for Justice, and many women do not have a government ID that reflects their current name. The elimination of early voting, same-day registration, and counting of provisional ballots in North Carolina are also expected to disproportionately affect voters of color who used these processes at a higher rate than white voters.
Women's health advocates came together in Central Florida last week to rally against the US Supreme Court's June ruling in Hobby Lobby v. Burwell and push for federal legislation to overturn the decision.
"It's unbelievable that in 2014, politicians and now bosses are trying to interfere with access to birth control," said Anna Eskamani, Director of External Affairs for Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando, about the Hobby Lobby decision. The Supreme Court ruled that because of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), closely-held corporations like Hobby Lobby could avoid paying for insurance coverage of birth control without penalty if they claimed a religious objection to contraceptives. "This shows a troubling level of disregard for American women, who should be able to make private medical decisions without asking for a permission slip from their bosses," Eskamani said.
In an attempt to reverse the ruling, several Democrats introduced the Protect Women's Health From Corporate Interference Act, referred to as the Not My Boss's Business Act, in both the House and Senate in July. It would prohibit employers from refusing to offer health coverage - including contraceptives - guaranteed to their employees under federal law. The bill also provides that no federal law, including RFRA, permits employers from refusing to comply with the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
The bill was blocked in the Senate last month, but Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) indicated that he intends to hold another vote on the bill later this year. The House version of the bill has been referred to the House Ways and Means Committee. Last Friday, constituents delivered 135 petitions to Congressman Daniel Webster (R-FL) in support of the bill.
A jury yesterday found Theodore Wafer, the Michigan man who shot and killed Renisha McBride, guilty of murder. The ruling disputed his claim that the killing was an act of self-defense justified under the state's "Stand Your Ground" law.
Wafer, a 55-year-old white man, was found guilty of one count of felony firearm, homicide, and the second-degree murder of McBride, a 19-year-old black woman. A 12-person jury deliberated over the decision for nearly ten hours over two days. Wafer will appear in court for sentencing Aug 25.
"As much as I think there was a sigh of relief when this verdict was rendered, there was also this sense that this was an exceptional case, and that this really could've gone another way," Dr. Treva Lindsey, Assistant Professor of Gender and Sexuality Studies at Ohio State University, said on Huffington Post Live. "Due to the sexist and racist logic embedded in our American injustice system [that] so often that leaves bodies like Renisha even a perpetrator in death. We still refer to it as the Renisha McBride trial as opposed to the Theodore Wafer trial. She's not even given the adequate status of a victim in this instance."
In November 2013, Wafer shot McBride when she came to his Dearborn, Michigan home looking for help following a car accident. WDIV-TV in Detroit reported that McBride knocked on the door and windows of Wafer's home. Wafer said he believed he was in danger and that more than one person was outside, so he retrieved his firearm. He did not call police until after he shot and killed McBride, who was unarmed. When he was charged, he maintained that he had acted in self-defense, claiming that Michigan's Stand Your Ground law should be applicable to his case.
Stand Your Ground laws, which allow individuals to act with force in self-defense even if they themselves have not been attacked with force, exist in approximately 30 states nationwide. McBride's death, which followed the Trayvon Martin case and arrest of Marissa Alexander, re-ignited dialogue nationwide about how those laws not only fail to protect people of color, but also put them in direct danger and disadvantage within the justice system. Some activists, however, believe the overall response to Renisha McBride's murder still has not resonated as much as the recent deaths of African American males whose killers also claimed Stand Your Ground laws as a defense.
"The thing that I felt yesterday, in addition to a level of relief, still, to me, the Internet was really, really, really silent," said Dr. Brittney Cooper, Assistant Professor of Women's & Gender Studies at Rutgers Universities, said in the same Huffington Post Live segment. "When you compare the level of conversation... Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis and Eric Garner, I don't feel like we got the level of catharsis for having gotten a conviction with Renisha."
Florida lawmakers are in Tallahassee today for a special nine-day session to redraw the state's congressional districts after a state court ruled last month that Republicans had illegally redrawn the districts for their own benefit.
Leon County, Florida Circuit Court Judge Terry Lewis found in July that state Republicans had created "a shadow redistricting process" that violated the state constitution and "made a mockery of the Legislature's transparent and open process of redistricting." He continued, "they might have successfully concealed their scheme and their actions from the public had it not been for the Plaintiffs' determined efforts to uncover it in this case."
The League of Women Voters of Florida brought the lawsuit challenging the redistricting plan, arguing that state Republicans had drawn congressional districts with the purpose of favoring GOP-candidates in violation of the Fair Districts Amendments to the state constitution, specifically intended to prohibit this kind of gerrymandering. Judge Lewis agreed, finding that the congressional redistricting plan was constitutionally invalid and ordering two districts, District 5 and District 10 to be redrawn as well as any other district affected by the redrawing. District 5 is currently held by Democrat Corrine Brown, and District 10 is held by Republican Dan Webster.
Florida state legislators now have until Aug 15 to redraw a map. Judge Terry, in a subsequent order, stressed that "time is of the essence," and noted that Florida's 2014 election could be delayed. "Even if a revised map was in place today," Lewis wrote, "the legal and logistical machinations it would take to have the election take place on November 4th under that revised map is not something justified by law or common sense. There is just no way, legally or logistically, to put in place a new map, amend the various deadlines and have elections on November 4th, as prescribed by Federal law."
After the deadline, Judge Terry will consider evidence concerning the "legal and logistical obstacles to holding delayed elections for affected districts in 2014." Legislators expect to close the special session by Tuesday, August 12, according to a report by the Tampa Bay Times.
The US Department of Justice filed a federal lawsuit against the commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania State Police last week alleging that the state police has engaged in a pattern and practice of employment discrimination against women.
In its suit, the DOJ alleges that the Pennsylvania state police excluded qualified women from consideration as entry-level troopers by requiring candidates to pass a physical fitness test that did not test for physical skills necessary to perform the job.
According to the DOJ complaint, the test "disproportionately screened out female applicants, resulting in a disparate impact against those applicants" under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Between 2003 and 2012, the female pass rate for the physical exam was less than 80 percent of the male pass rate. That gap kept 45 qualified females from becoming state troopers despite the physical fitness test being unrelated to the performance of the job.
The DOJ is seeking a court order to end to the physical fitness test and to require defendants "to provide make-whole relief, including backpay with interest, offers of employment, retroactive seniority, and other benefits to women who have suffered losses or will suffer losses" because of the state police's policies. A spokesperson for current Gov. Tom Corbett (R) said lawyers for the state are reviewing the DOJ's lawsuit.
"The Department of Justice is deeply committed to eliminating artificial barriers that keep qualified women out of public safety work," said Jocelyn Samuels, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. She reiterated the Department's overall commitment to challenge all discriminatory hiring practices on the basis of sex.
"Despite overwhelming evidence that women and men are equally capable of police work," a 2002 report by the Feminist Majority Foundation found "widespread bias in police hiring, selection practices and recruitment policies keeps the numbers of women in law enforcement artificially low." According to data collected by the DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), the number of women within state police departments has traditionally been sparse. Nationwide, in 2007, only about 6.5 percent of full-time state police and highway patrol officers were women, representing only a small increase from 1987 when women were only 3.8 percent of state police departments.
Cities and states across the United States have been responding differently to the US Supreme Court's decision in June to strike down Massachusetts' 35-foot abortion clinic buffer zone in McCullen v. Coakley, with some jurisdictions suspending their buffer zone laws and others continuing to enforce the protective measures.
The McCullen decision invalidated only one statute: a fixed, 35-foot buffer zone law in Massachusetts. In making its decision, the Court found that this specific Massachusetts law was unconstitutional, not that state and local governments could never enact measures to protect patients, doctors, and staff from harassment and intimidation outside of reproductive health clinics. In addition, the Court did not overturn a previous buffer zone case, Hill v. Colorado, that upheld a statute prohibiting a person - within 100 feet of a clinic entrance - from approaching within 8 feet of another person, without that person's consent.
After the ruling, the Attorney General of New York, Eric Schneiderman, issued a statement clarifying that the McCullen decision did not implicate his state's clinic buffer zone laws. Seventeen counties in New York state have buffer zones as a result of a court injunction. Additionally, New York City, encompassing 5 additional counties, has a 15-foot buffer zone law. Noting that anti-abortion activists had attempted to assert that McCullen invalidated all buffer zones, Schneiderman issued an open letter to clarify the law.
"We will not allow activists to use a narrowly targeted Supreme Court decision as an opportunity to create confusion about the critical protections here in New York," wrote Schneiderman. "Not only do New York State's clinic protection laws remain completely in place, I am committed to working with our partners in law enforcement to ensure they are fully enforced."
Other state and local governments, however, have - reluctantly and often in the context of ongoing legal disputes - either repealed, in the case of Portland, Maine, or suspended enforcement of their buffer zone laws. The city of Madison, Wisconsin recently announced that it would not enforce its buffer zone law, one that is similar to that in Hill v. Colorado, and New Hampshire has stopped enforcing its 25-foot buffer zone. Both jurisdictions are in the middle of legal challenges to their laws.
In the wake of the ruling in McCullen, the state of Massachusetts enacted a new state law to protect access to reproductive health facilities. The new law, signed by Governor Deval Patrick last week, went into effect immediately.
"Patients, doctors, and healthcare workers are under siege at clinics across the nation," said Feminist Majority Foundation President Eleanor Smeal in a press release issued on the day of oral argument in McCullen. "Simply put, safety buffer zones help prevent violence and allow women to safely access critical reproductive health services." Clinic safety zones have been a vital tool to help ensure that patients, doctors, and healthcare workers can enter reproductive healthcare facilities without harassment, intimidation, or violence.
For over 20 years, the Feminist Majority Foundation (FMF) has tracked incidents of violence, harassment, and intimidation at women's health clinics in the US. FMF brought the first lawsuit in the nation on buffer zones to the US Supreme Court in 1994. That case, Madsen v. Women's Health Center, established the constitutionality of an injunction creating a clinic safety buffer zone in Florida.
Take Action! Keep women's clinics safe and open! Support the Feminist Majority Foundation's National Clinic Access Project.
Federal US District Court Judge Myron Thompson ruled yesterday that an Alabama TRAP (targeted regulation of abortion provider) law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges is unconstitutional.
In his 172-page opinion, Judge Thompson detailed the history of violence against Alabama abortion providers, explaining that the context of violence could not be overlooked in deciding whether the admitting privileges requirement placed an undue burden on a woman's right to obtain a legal abortion. Specifically, Judge Thompson recounted the 1993 murder of Dr. David Gunn, an Alabama resident who provided abortion services in Alabama and Florida; the 1997 arson of a clinic in Tuscaloosa, Alabama; the 1998 bombing of the Birmingham, Alabama clinic by extremist Eric Robert Rudolf; and more recent incidents of violence, harassment, and intimidation, including an incident five or six years ago when someone drove through the front of the Tuscaloosa clinic. In addition, during the 10-day bench trial, doctors - who were identified by pseudonyms and had to testify from behind a black curtain - described their "daily fears" as abortion providers in the state, explaining how they had not only experienced threats to their professional reputations but also to their personal safety.
In this climate, none of the doctors involved in the case - many of whom travel into the state to provide services at the Alabama clinics - could obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals, leading Alabama's clinics - already dwindling in number - to close.
"At last sanity," said Feminist Majority Foundation President Eleanor Smeal. "The Feminist Majority Foundation has been defending the abortion clinics in Alabama since 1989, and Judge Thompson's account of the violence was spot on. In the hostile climate created by extremists, it is no wonder that doctors have to be flown in to provide care. The TRAP law had only one purpose: to close comprehensive reproductive health clinics for women."
Judge Thompson found that hostility toward abortion providers created significant obstacles to recruiting local doctors, who could perhaps - though not certainly - obtain admitting privileges, including "that the number of abortion doctors nationally and throughout the South is declining; the decision to perform abortions carries detrimental professional consequences in Alabama; violence against and harassment of abortion providers, beyond run-of-the-mill political protest, persist in the State." Also "prior attempts to recruit local doctors have failed dramatically; and there are significant regulatory barriers to entry for a new doctor to begin providing abortions at any scale."
Given this situation, and finding that the law was unnecessary to protect patient health and safety, Judge Thompson ruled that Alabama's admitting privileges requirement places a needless difficulty on a woman's right to an abortion. "The evidence compellingly demonstrates that the requirement would have the striking result of closing three of Alabama's five abortion clinics, clinics which perform only early abortions, long before viability."
Alabama passed the admitting privileges requirement in 2013. The law was immediately challenged by Reproductive Health Services and Planned Parenthood Southeast which operate comprehensive women's health clinics in Montgomery, Birmingham, and Mobile. As a result, the law has not been enforced.
Judge Thompson asked the parties in the case to provide more information to determine whether a permanent injunction of the law is necessary. In the meantime, the law will continue to go unenforced against the plaintiffs.
After the ruling, CEO and President of Planned Parenthood Southeast Staci Fox issued a statement saying, "Politicians passed this law in order to make it impossible for women in Alabama to get abortions, plain and simple. ... This victory ensures that women in Alabama can make their own private health care decisions without the interference from politicians."
Judge Thompson, an African-American judge appointed to the bench by President Carter, delayed his decision in order to review a ruling by a panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upholding a preliminary injunction against a similar Mississippi TRAP law. The Fifth Circuit opinion, written by District Court Judge E. Grady Jolly, appointed by President Ronald Reagan, was decided 2-1.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Thursday to uphold a 2011 law, championed by Governor Scott Walker (R), that significantly decreased collective bargaining rights for workers in public employee unions. The Court also ruled in favor of the state's 2011 voter identification law - the same law that was found unconstitutional by a federal district court judge in May.
In the collective bargaining case, the Court ruled 5-2 that the law did not violate the constitutional freedom of association. "No matter the limitations or burdens a legislative enactment places on the collective bargaining process," wrote Justice Michael J. Gableman for the majority, "collective bargaining remains a creation of legislative grace and not constitutional obligation."
The anti-union law, known at Act 10, sparked giant protests in Madison, Wisconsin in 2011. Tens of thousands rallied against the bill, with some camping out in the state Capitol Rotunda. Schools were closed during the protests, and students at the University of Wisconsin in Madison staged a walk out, marching from campus to the Capitol. The law ultimately led to recall efforts against Governor Walker.
Also on Thursday,the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled to uphold a law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls. A federal district judge had ruled earlier this year that the same law unjustifiably targeted minority voters, who were less likely to have qualifying identification than whites, and would result in less opportunities for minorities to participate in the political process, a finding that District Court Judge Lynn Aldelman found particularly troublesome given "the disproportionate impact of the photo ID requirement results from the interaction of the requirement with the effects of past or present discrimination." Judge Adelman also found that Wisconsin had experienced virtually no voter fraud that would justify the law.
The impact of the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling on voter ID is limited, though the state hopes to use it in the federal case. The federal court decision on the voter ID law is pending appeal in the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
A bipartisan group of Senators introduced a bill Wednesday that aims to address the issue of sexual assault on college campuses.
The Campus Accountability and Safety Act, cosponsored by Senators Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Dean Heller (R-NV), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Mark Warner (D-VA), and Marco Rubio (R-FL), focuses on steps colleges can take to proactively protect students. The bill specifically aims to establish new campus resources and support services for student survivors, ensure minimum training standards for on-campus personnel, create transparency requirements, increase campus accountability and coordination with law enforcement, and establish enforceable Title IX and Clery Act violation penalties. It will require colleges to designate a Confidential Advisor, conduct annual surveys to identify the scope of the problem, and use a uniform process for campus disciplinary proceedings, among other requirements.
"To curb these crimes, students need to be protected and empowered, and institutions must provide the highest level of responsiveness in helping hold perpetrators fully accountable," said Senator McCaskill in a press release. "That's what our legislation aims to accomplish."
To develop the bill, McCaskill surveyed 440 institutions of higher education, held roundtable discussions with key stakeholders, and produced a survey report of her findings. Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) introduced a bipartisan companion bill in the House on Thursday.
Several other pieces of legislation have been introduced to protect students and hold attackers accountable. The Survivor Outreach and Support Campus Act (S.O.S. Campus Act), sponsored by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Congresswoman Susan Davis (D-CA) in the House, focuses on requiring colleges and universities to establish an independent, on-campus advocate to support survivors. The advocate would be responsible for ensuring that survivors of sexual assault have access to emergency care and information on their legal rights. Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D-CA) with Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-PA) also introduced the Hold Accountable and Lend Transparency (HALT) on Campus Sexual Assault Act.
Two new bills introduced in Congress could help improve health outcomes for people of color, low income communities, and female members of the U.S. Armed Forces. Authors of both bills are using the legislative gains of the Affordable Care Act to increase access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare.
In the House, Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA-40), Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Health Task Force, introduced the Health Equity and Accountability Act (HEAA) of 2014. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, and the Congressional Black Caucus have all supported the bill, which seeks to "eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare access and health outcomes."
The HEAA is intended to build on the advancements of the Affordable Care Act by making federal resources available to target inequitable health access in vulnerable communities; creating federal guidelines for data collection and reporting; increasing cultural and linguistic-appropriate health care; and improving federal efforts to better health outcomes for women and families.
"We believe that no one's life expectancy should be determined by the color of their skin, or the zip code in which they are born," said Rep. Roybal-Allard in a statement announcing the introduction of the bill. "By adopting HEAA's wide spectrum strategy of racial, ethnic, ability, language, and gender health disparity elimination initiatives, we hope to dramatically reduce the disproportionately high rates of premature death and preventable illness in our minority communities."
The National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health (NLIRH) issued a release on Wednesday highlighting the HEAA's specific impact on reproductive wellness. The bill would increase "access to comprehensive sexuality education and emergency contraception for communities of color" and help reduce unintended pregnancies for disproportionately impacted young people of color "including rural, LGBTQ, immigrant, and youth in the juvenile justice system."
In the Senate, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) introduced the Access to Contraception for Women Servicemembers and Dependents Act of 2014. The bill would dump existing Department of Defense policy on contraceptive health coverage and family planning counseling and replace it with a health care policy that matches civilian offerings under the Affordable Care Act. If passed, female service members would be entitled to FDA-approved contraception with no health insurance co-pays, like civilian populations.
"Female service members deserve access to the same basic health care as the women they protect," Sen. Shaheen said in a statement. "It's unacceptable that they don't." The bill is meant to build on the "Shaheen Amendment" which was signed into law last year. The Shaheen Amendment extends reproductive health services to females in the Armed Forces.
Currently, only service members on active duty have full coverage of prescription contraceptives without co-pays through the military health insurance program, TRICARE. Service members who are not on active duty do not have similar coverage through TRICARE. According to recent report by the Center for American Progress, the rate of unplanned pregnancy in the military is up to 50 percent higher than in the civilian population because of insufficient access to contraceptive care services.
President Obama signed an executive order last week aimed at promoting fair pay and safe workplaces for workers employed by federal contractors.
The Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order is intended to hold corporations accountable by requiring prospective federal contractors to disclose labor law violations from the previous three years and to collect that information from subcontractors. It will also crack down on repeat violators, protect responsible contractors, offer guidance to companies on how to improve, and streamline implementation and contractor reporting, which will promote the efficiency of federal contracts. The order will also give employees more power by giving them information about their paychecks and giving them "a day in court:" it will prevent companies from requiring them to enter into a pre-dispute arbitration agreement for problems that arise from violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act or torts related to sexual assault or harassment.
More than one in five American workers is employed by a firm that contracts with the federal government, and nearly one in three companies with the worst safety and wage violations are federal contractors. According to a recent US Senate Committee report, w
"Our tax dollars shouldn't go to companies that violate workplace laws. They shouldn't go to companies that violate worker rights. If a company is going to receive taxpayer money, it should have safe workplaces. It should pay its workers the wages they've earned. It should provide the medical leave workers are entitled to. It should not discriminate against workers," President Obama said when he signed the Order. "The vast majority of the companies that contract with our government, they play by the rules. They live up to the right workplace standards. But some don't."
The Executive Order, part of President Obama's "Year of Action," will apply to new federal contractors valued at over $500,000 and will be implemented in stages throughout 2016. President Obama previously signed executive orders banning LGBT discrimination in the workplace for federal contracts and promoting pay equity for women in the workplace.
Over 250 people gathered inside the Dirksen Senate building on Wednesday to support legislation aimed at decreasing intimate partner homicide through gun violence.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) chaired the standing-room only Senate Judiciary Committee hearing - which required an overflow room â€“ and was joined by Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Ranking Member Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT).
"As a former prosecutor, I have seen firsthand how domestic violence and stalking can destroy lives and tear apart families,"Â Klobuchar said.Â "My legislation would help protect victims and keep our families safe, and I will continue to work to pass this commonsense bill."
Current federal law restricts domestic violence offenders' access to firearms, but loopholes in the law have allowed abusers to gain access to guns â€“ often with tragic results. Elvin Daniel, a member of the National Rifle Association (NRA), testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about his sister Zina who was murdered by her estranged husband and abuser. Zina had a restraining order against her murderer, who â€œcontinued to terrorize Zina, slashing her tires while she was at work, and threatening her physically." Then, in 2012, he purchased a gun â€“ without a background check â€“through an online gun seller. The very next day after receiving the weapon, he "stormed into the spa where Zina worked in Brookfield, Wisconsin," where "he shot and killed Zina, murdered two other women, and injured four others before killing himself."
TheÂ national gun lobby defeated bipartisan legislation last year that would have expanded background checks to gun shows and internet sales. Websites like the one Zinaâ€™s shooter used to purchase a gun often connect buyers with unlicensed sellers, a problem still in need of a solution.
Women fleeing domestic violence are particularly vulnerable to increased violence and death. Senator Blumenthal introduced the Lori Jackson Domestic Violence Survivor Protection Act (S. 2483) in June to prevent domestic violence abusers served with temporary orders of protection from owning firearms. Blumenthal named the law after Lori Jackson, a mother of two, who was shot and killed by her estranged husband. Jackson had fled her home and obtained a temporary order of protection. She was murdered by her husband with a legally-possessed firearm only one day before the court was to hold hearings on a permanent order of protection, that if granted would have prevented him from possessing the gun.
Senator Blumental, along with Senators Tim Kaine (D-VA) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) has also introduced legislation to strengthen the Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban, which prevents abusers convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence assault from owning a firearm. Legislation has also been introduced by Senator Klobuchar that would provide victims of dating violence and stalking with the same legal protections as victims of domestic violence.Â Senator Blumenthal commented at the hearing that "federal law is a shadow of what it should be," and called on Congress not only to set the standard but to give incentives and punishments to states to ensure that federal legislation aimed at preventing domestic violence homicide, is enforced.
According to the National Network to End Domestic Violence, women in the United States are 11 times more likely to be murdered with a gun than women in other high-income countries, and victims of domestic violence who live in homes with guns have an 8-fold increase in homicide risk.
Uganda's Constitutional Court today struck down - on procedural grounds - a package of anti-gay policies signed into law this February by President Yoweri Museveni, but left room for lawmakers to attempt to pass the law, or another version of it, again.
Ten petitioners, including activists, academics, advocates, and MPs, challenged the draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act in court, claiming that it was passed improperly and violated the constitutional rights of Ugandans to live free from discrimination and with privacy and dignity. Although the five-judge panel ruled that the legislation was "null and void" because it had been passed illegally - without a proper quorum in the Parliament - the Court did not address the claims that it violated Uganda's constitution.
"The ideal situation would have been to deal with the other issues of the law, to sort this thing out once and for all," said Nicholas Opiyo, a Ugandan lawyer and one of the petitioners.
The decision was met with cheers in the courthouse. Frank Mugisha, a gay-rights activist Uganda, said the ruling was a "step forward."
The government has not yet determined whether it will appeal the ruling. The Anti-Homosexuality Act expanded the scope of a colonial-era law, still in place in Uganda, that criminalized "sex acts against the order of nature." The now defunct law included lesbians for the first time and implemented extreme punishments for anyone who engaged in "aggravated homosexuality" or "attempted to commit homosexuality." It also imposed punishments of imprisonment and fines on organizations that promoted or supported the LGBTQ community.
The court's ruling comes in advance of next week's US-Africa Summit in Washington. Activists and legislators from the United States had asked President Obama to speak out against anti-gay laws in Nigeria and Uganda at the Summit, which will be attended by Uganda's President. Several European countries and the United States restricted or ended aid programs with Uganda after the Anti-Homosexuality Act became law.
Uganda saw an increase in discrimination and violence against gay people directly after the Anti-Homosexuality Act was proposed. As reported by Jeanne Clark in "Unholy Alliance" in the Fall 2013 issue of Ms. magazine, David Kato, a leader of the gay rights movement in Uganda, was beaten to death shortly after the introduction of the bill. In addition, "The attacks against gays in the country have further demonized condom usage," Clark writes - a tragedy in a country where HIV prevalence rates for gay men, in the capital of Kampala, is at 13 percent. The bill has also interfered with HIV/AIDS programs. The AP reports that Ugandan police raided a US-funded HIV/AIDS clinic after the bill was passed.
Commenting on the Ugandan Court's decision,Michel Sidib, Executive Director of the UNAIDS, proclaimed, "This is a great day for social justice."
Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick (D) signed into law yesterday a bill to help protect access to reproductive health care facilities in the state.
The law, entitled An Act to Promote Public Safety and Protect Access to Reproductive Health Care Facilities, enables a law enforcement official to order the "immediate dispersal of a gathering that substantially impedes access to or departure from an entrance or a driveway to a reproductive health care facility." The order would "remain in place for 8 hours or until the close of business of the reproductive health facility, whichever is earlier," and make noncompliance punishable with a fine or jail time. The law also enacts a state-version of the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE),prohibiting the use of force, threats, intimidation, or other acts meant to impede access to a clinic.
"I am incredibly proud to sign legislation that continues Massachusetts leadership in ensuring that women seeking to access reproductive health facilities can do so safely and without harassment, and that the employees of those facilities can arrive at work each day without fear of harm," said Governor Patrick.
The new Massachusetts legislation was passed in response to the US Supreme Court decision in McCullen v. Coakley, striking down the state's 35-foot clinic buffer zone law, which had been set up to protect doctors, clinic patients, and staff from violence, harassment, and intimidation. The law will go into effect immediately.
"The US Supreme Court failed to appreciate the history of violence, harassment, and intimidation that doctors, patients, and clinic staff have had to endure," said Feminist Majority Foundation Executive Director Katherine Spillar. "This new law will help ensure that no one will have to walk a gauntlet to exercise her constitutional right to abortion."
Massachusetts had first enacted a buffer zone law in 2000 after repeated incidents of clinic violence and intimidation in Massachusetts, including the murders in 1994 of two clinic receptionists, Shannon Lowney, 25, and Lee Ann Nichols, 38, by anti-abortion extremist John Salvi at two separate clinics in Brookline. Five other people were wounded in those attacks. The law was subsequently strengthened in 2007 to create the 35-foot safety buffer zone after anti-abortion demonstrators continued to crowd clinic entrances, block cars from entering driveways, and intimidate patients, doctors, and healthcare workers. At the time, local law enforcement made clear that having a better-defined buffer zone would promote public safety.
Mississippi's last remaining abortion clinic will remain open after a the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction against HB 1390, the Mississippi TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) law requiring abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at area hospitals.
Had the court not upheld the lower federal's court's injunction, HB 1390 would have shuttered Jackson Women's Health Organization (JWHO), the state's only comprehensive reproductive health center. After the enactment of the law, two of the three doctors affiliated with the clinic attempted to obtain admitting privileges at at least seven Jackson-area hospitals, but every hospital denied their request, citing reasons such as "the nature of your proposed medical practice is inconsistent with this Hospital's policies" and that their medical practice would disrupt the hospital's relationship with the community. Because the doctors could not obtain admitting privileges, Mississippi threatened to revoke the clinic's license and shut its doors.
Mississippi's TRAP laws have gradually eroded families' access to comprehensive care, bringing the total number of clinics from 14 in 1981 to just one in 2014. When HB 1390 was signed into law, Gov. Phil Bryant called it the "first step in a movement" to end abortion in Mississippi.
"The Mississippi TRAP law would have closed the only comprehensive women's reproductive health clinic in the state and necessitated women driving hundreds of miles to exercise their constitutional right to an abortion," said Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority Foundation. "For women who could not afford to travel out of state, this ruling literally saves lives."
Writing for the majority, Judge E. Grady Jolly said the decision boiled down to whether or not the state of Mississippi could get in the way of a woman's Constitutionally protected right to choose an abortion. Jolly called out the state's argument that Mississippi citizens could obtain an abortion in Tennessee, Louisiana, or Alabama. "Mississippi may not shift its obligation to respect the constitutional rights of its citizen to another state," Jolly wrote. "Such a proposal would not only place an undue burden on the exercise of the constitutional right, but would also disregard a state's obligation under the principle of federalism--applicable to all fifty states--to accept the burden of the non-delegable duty of protecting the established federal constitutional rights of its own citizens."
The Center for Reproductive Rights filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Jackson Women's Health Organization. In a press release issued by the organization yesterday, President and CEO Nancy Northrup said, "For far too long, women in Mississippi have been teetering on the precipice of a reality similar to the dark days before Roe v. Wade, where reproductive health care options were limited at best and life-threatening at worst."
Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant said he will work with the state's Attorney General, who is petitioning for the full Fifth Circuit to review the panel's decision.
Meanwhile, three anti-abortion extremists were convicted in Jackson City Municipal court on Monday for interfering with access to the Jackson clinic. DuVergne Gaines, Director of the Feminist Majority Foundation National Clinic Access Project, was in Jackson for both the local convictions and for the Fifth Circuit decision. She called the convictions of Roy McMillan, Chet Gallagher, and Harriet Ashley, "a huge victory." She continued, "These extremists have, literally, laid siege to this facility for the last two years since we learned its fate was in jeopardy because of Mississippi's TRAP law. We're thankful for the police department's vigilance in enforcing the law."
Representatives George Miller (D-CA) and Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) introduced a bill last week that aims to protect hourly workers from scheduling abuses and allow for greater flexibility and certainty around their work schedules.
The Schedules that Work Act (HR 5159) will protect employees from retaliation if they request a more flexible or stable schedule, require that retail, food service and cleaning employees receive their work schedules at least two weeks in advance, and create a process for employers to consider special scheduling requests of employees. It will also ensure that workers are compensated for at least four hours of work if they show up to work when scheduled for four hours but are sent home early, and provide them with an extra hour of pay if they are scheduled to work non-consecutive shifts in one day.
"Low-wage workers in America are too often being jerked around," said Rep. DeLauro, Co-Chair of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. "These women - and they are usually women - cannot plan ahead, or make arrangements to see that their kids and family are being taken care of. This bill would protect low-wage workers from abuse and help ensure they can look after their families. Congress needs to ensure that people putting in a hard day's work get a fair day's pay and the ability to care for their loved ones."
An improvement in scheduling practices would largely benefit women workers, who account for almost three-fourths of federally funded, low-wage workers, and people of color, who are over-represented in this workforce. According to a study released by Demos last month, 1.3 million women working in the retail industry live in or near poverty. Low-wages, unpredictable hours and lack of full-time opportunities present real obstacles to these workers' economic security.
Companion legislation to HR 5159 is being sponsored in the Senate by Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Tom Harkin (D-IA).
After journeying 273 miles on foot, Adam O'Neal, Republican Mayor of Belhaven, North Carolina, arrived on the lawn of the US Capitol earlier this week for a special Moral Monday gathering. O'Neal hiked to Washington, DC to protest the closing of Vidant Pungo Hospital in rural Beaufort County, NC, and to call attention to the impact of his state's failure to expand Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
"We the people need to stand together to produce health care for us all," wrote O'Neal before embarking on his first steps of his 15-day trip to the Capitol. Over 100 members of O'Neal's community as well as folks from the NAACP-NC chapter, including Rev. Dr. William Barber, joined him in solidarity.
Vidant Pungo Hospital in Belhaven was forced to close on July 1, in part because of North Carolina's refusal to expand Medicaid. Only days later, Portia Gibbs, a 48-year old mother of three, died of a heart attack and other health complications while awaiting transport to the next nearest hospital - over 75 miles away. "She spent the last hour of her life in a parking lot at a high school waiting for a helicopter," explained O'Neal on Monday.
"If the governor and the Legislature don't want to accept Medicaid expansion, they need to come up with another program to assure that rural hospitals don't close," said O'Neal. "They;re allowing people to die to prove a point. That is wrong, and I'm not going to be a party to that." He continued, "Rural citizens dying should not be soldiers of the South;s defiance to the new health care law."
Rural hospitals in states such as Virginia, Georgia and Tennessee - which have all refused Medicaid expansion - will soon be closing or cutting vital health care services. Many of these hospitals serve poorer populations with higher numbers of uninsured individuals. In North Carolina, according to O'Neal, the rejection of Medicaid expansion costs the state's health care system $2 billion a year, denying hundreds of thousands of low-income individuals access to care.
A recent study released by George Washington University found that community health centers in states that have expanded Medicaid subsidies have seen 2.9 million patients gain health coverage in 2014. O'Neal is calling for this kind of progress to occur in North Carolina, explaining that the situation has become "do-or-die".
Twenty-seven states and Washington, DC have already expanded Medicaid, leading to a 15.3 percent increase in Medicaid enrollment in those states. Medicaid is our nation's health insurance program for low-income families and individuals. The program - celebrating, along with Medicare, its 49th anniversary today - also funds health centers that provide care for under-served communities. Historically, the majority of Medicaid beneficiaries - over 22 million in 2009 - have been women. Though programs differ by state, before the ACA Medicaid expansion, Medicaid covered only pregnant women, children under 8, adults with dependent children, the elderly, the differently-abled and the blind. The ACA, however, now allows states to expand Medicaid eligibility to all Americans with incomes below 138% of the federal poverty level. There is no deadline for states to opt into ACA Medicaid expansion and eligible individuals can enroll in Medicaid at any time.
Hundreds of supporters from all over the United States marched to the Duval County Courthouse in Jacksonville, FL yesterday to demand that all charges against Marissa Alexander be dropped. Chants heard on the way to the Courthouse also underscored growing demand for State Attorney Angela Corey's dismissal.
Free Marissa Now and Sister Song, Inc. are leading a week-long mobilization on Alexander's behalf. The Standing Our Ground Week of Action kicked off Friday, July 25 and will continue through August 1. Satellite participants in the week of action have shown their support for Alexander using the #StandingOurGround and #SelfiesForSelfDefense hashtags.
Alexander, an African American mother of three, fired a warning shot after being strangled and threatened to death by her estranged husband in August 2010. A restraining order was in place at the time of the incident. Alexander's husband, Rico Gray, has a well-documented history of domestic violence against Marissa and other former partners. Alexander was once hospitalized because of injuries sustained in an incident with Gray. Nevertheless, Florida's mandatory minimum sentence for "pulling the trigger during a crime" is 20 years. Alexander could face up to 60 years in prison for allegedly endangering Gray's life and the lives of her two stepsons.
"Today, it's Marissa. Tomorrow, it's you. And yesterday, it was Trayvon," said poet Staceyann Chin with Free Marissa Now. "We see this as a human rights violation against [Marissa's] right to parent, against her bodily autonomy," Monica Simpson, Executive Director of Sister Song, told WTEV-TV.
Last week, a judge denied attorneys' requests to grant Alexander a new hearing under Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law. In June, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed a bill into law that includes warning shots under "Stand Your Ground," but it will not retroactively apply to Marissa Alexander's case. Free Marissa Now and Sister Song intend this week's action to coincide with Alexander's retrial, which was previously scheduled for this month. A Florida appeals court ordered a new trial for Alexander after finding the lower court had issued improper jury instructions on self-defense.
Alexander is now set to be retried in December.
The Obama administration plans to conduct a large study on female genital mutilation (FGM) to try to assess how many girls and women in the US are at risk, and how many have already experienced, FGM.
According to experts, FGM tends to take place during summer break when parents take their daughter outside of the country for the practice.
Jaha Dukureh, a 24-year-old woman who grew up in Gambia, experienced FGM there, and then child marriage in the US, started a petition that gained more than 220,000 supporters. Dukureh, whose campaign was backed by The Guardian, says her half-sister died from complications of FGM. The successful campaign called on the Obama administration to conduct a report on the statistics of FGM in the United States.
Catherine Russell, US Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's Issues, attending the Girl Summit in London last week, indicated that the study would be conducted by the US Department of Health and Human Services. The Summit, hosted by the United Kingdom and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and attended by more than 600 people, aimed at mobilizing global efforts to end FGM and child, early and forced marriage (CEFM) within a generation.
In her petition, Dukureh says: "Many in the US hear about FGM and think it only happens in far away lands. Unfortunately, this is far from reality. I hear from girls every day that were born here in the United States who have been through FGM. These young women are your average American teenagers -- some of them you know, some of them you went or go to school with. And there are many more girls in the US that are at risk of being cut. The practice of FGM is illegal in the US but girls are being taken to other countries, usually their parents country of origin where they are cut in what is now known as 'vacation cutting.'"
The Obama administration has set up a preliminary working group for FGM prevention and action. Its first step is to examine the extent of FGM in the US and explore ways to eliminate the practice. The practice of FGM on girls under 18 has been a crime in the US since 1996. Last year, President Obama strengthened the law by making it a crime to transport a girl outside of the US for the purpose of FGM.
Sometimes referred to as female genital cutting or female circumcision, FGM is the removal or cutting of part or all of a woman or girl's genitals. The practice, which is medically unnecessary, can lead to serious health issues such as infection, illness and death. FGM still affects up to 140 million women and girls worldwide.
Video via Change.org and The Guardian.
Last night, three of four anti-abortion extremists were found guilty by a Jackson, Miss. court for activities carried out during protests against the state's last-standing abortion clinic, Jackson Women's Health Organization (JWHO).
Roy McMillan was found guilty for obstructing the sidewalk entrance to a Mississippi clinic. McMillan is already subject to a federal injunction that bars him from entering a certain radius of the clinic. Harriett Ashley was found guilty for obstructing the sidewalk entrance of the abortion clinic and for failing to obey a police officer. Ashley cannot attempt to make contact with the clinic or use the clinic sidewalk. Chet Gallagher was found guilty for interference with a lawful business. Gallagher was also barred from making contact with the clinic and charged a $500 fine.ï¿½Charges against Cal Zastrow, a fourth defendant and anti-abortion activist, were dropped last night.
The Feminist Majority Foundation's National Clinic Access Project (NCAP) Executive Director, duVergne Gaines, was in Jackson City Court last night for the proceedings. "This was a huge victory," Gaines said. "These extremists were held accountable for obstructing access to the last remaining clinic in the state of Mississippi, the Jackson Women's Health Organization," she said. "They have, literally, laid siege to this facility for the last two years since we learned its fate was in jeopardy because of Mississippi's TRAP law." Gaines continued, "We're thankful for the police department's vigilance in enforcing the law."
Each of the convicted defendants has a notorious past in clinic aggression and intimidation. Chet Gallagher was fired by the Las Vegas, NV Police Department after participating in an Operation Rescue demonstration in uniform, using his uniform to gain access to a clinic, then destroying clinic property. Gallagher later served time in prison for those offenses. Another defendant is a supporter of justifiable homicide. Harriett Ashley has ties to anti-abortion extremists that have championed justifiable homicide of doctors, clinic workers, and supporters.
Over the past two days, NCAP has been training local volunteers, clinic escorts and legal observers countering the Operation Rescue/Operation Save America protests aimed at JWHO. Patients visiting the facility were able to safely enter the clinic despite dozens of anti-abortion demonstrators who staged a service outside of the clinic on Sunday.
7/29/2014 - Women Just Won Big In Mississippi
Feminist Majority Foundation leaders are elated by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding a preliminary injunction against a Mississippi TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider) law that would have closed the only abortion clinic in the state. FMF congratulates the Center for Reproductive Rights and the Jackson Women's Health Organization (JWHO) for this important win.
"This is a major victory for the women of Mississippi and potentially for the women of the United States. The Mississippi TRAP law would have closed the only comprehensive women's reproductive health clinic in the state and necessitated women driving hundreds of miles to exercise their constitutional right to an abortion. For women who could not afford to travel out of state, this ruling literally saves lives," said Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority Foundation, who encouraged the founder of the JWHO, Susan Hill, to establish the clinic. Hill opened JWHO to ensure that low-income women in Mississippi could access a full range of reproductive health services.
"Although we celebrate this ruling," continued Smeal, "we cannot rest until this law and all other TRAP laws are permanently struck down."
DuVergne Gaines, Director of the Feminist Majority Foundation National Clinic Access Project said, "As leader of the Feminist Majority Foundation's clinic defense team, I am here in Mississippi, and we are elated by this federal appeals court decision today as well as with the local convictions yesterday of three anti-abortion extremists in Jackson City Municipal court for interfering with access to the Jackson clinic."
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Mississippi state law requiring doctors at the only abortion clinic in Jackson to have admitting privileges at a local hospital was an unconstitutional burden on women's right to choose an abortion. This decision means that the Jackson Women's Health Organization will remain open despite state legislative attempts to make Mississippi an abortion-free state.
7/29/2014 - Women Just Won Big In Mississippi
Feminist Majority Foundation leaders are elated by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding a preliminary injunction against a Mississippi TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider) law that would have closed the only abortion clinic in the state. FMF congratulates the Center for Reproductive Rights and the Jackson Women's Health Organization (JWHO) for this important win.
“This is a major victory for the women of Mississippi and potentially for the women of the United States. The Mississippi TRAP law would have closed the only comprehensive women’s reproductive health clinic in the state and necessitated women driving hundreds of miles to exercise their constitutional right to an abortion. For women who could not afford to travel out of state, this ruling literally saves lives,” said Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority Foundation, who encouraged the founder of the JWHO, Susan Hill, to establish the clinic. Hill opened JWHO to ensure that low-income women in Mississippi could access a full range of reproductive health services.
“Although we celebrate this ruling,” continued Smeal, “we cannot rest until this law and all other TRAP laws are permanently struck down.”
DuVergne Gaines, Director of the Feminist Majority Foundation National Clinic Access Project said, “As leader of the Feminist Majority Foundation’s clinic defense team, I am here in Mississippi, and we are elated by this federal appeals court decision today as well as with the local convictions yesterday of three anti-abortion extremists in Jackson City Municipal court for interfering with access to the Jackson clinic.”
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Mississippi state law requiring doctors at the only abortion clinic in Jackson to have admitting privileges at a local hospital was an unconstitutional burden on women’s right to choose an abortion. This decision means that the Jackson Women’s Health Organization will remain open despite state legislative attempts to make Mississippi an abortion-free state.