Founding Feminists is FMF’s daily herstory column.
The rivalry between the National Women’s Party and the League of Women Voters went international this week, with one victory for each side so far.
The stage upon which the battle between the two wings of the American women’s rights movement is being fought is the Tenth Congress of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance, which opens tomorrow at the Sorbonne in Paris.
The first volley in the present conflict was fired by Belle Sherwin of the L.W.V., who objected to the admission of the N.W.P. as a second group representing the women of America:
The League objects to the admission of the Woman’s Party on a ground which every one concerned recognizes as a fact – that the Woman’s Party and the League are opposed to each other in policy and political action.
Sherwin then used the National Woman’s Party’s sponsorship and strong support of the Equal Rights Amendment to illustrate the difference between the philosophies of the two factions. Though both groups support equal suffrage worldwide and the general principle of equal opportunities for women, the League opposes the kind of absolute equality in all circumstances demanded by the Woman’s Party, and endorses some “protective” labor laws applying only to women. The National Woman’s Party recognizes that so-called “protective” labor laws applying only to women are actually more “restrictive” than “protective” and simply make it harder for women to compete with men for jobs.
Despite a fine presentation by Doris Stevens, head of the N.W.P. delegation, the group was denied admission to the International Woman Suffrage Alliance by its board of directors, even though several other nations were permitted to be represented by more than one group.
But while the L.W.V. won that round yesterday, the N.W.P. is celebrating today. A committee of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance has just endorsed the main resolution the N.W.P. came here to support. Following a vigorous debate, the committee voted 70 to 38 to submit to the convention a resolution stating that “no special regulations for women’s work different from regulation for men’s should be imposed on women; that the only policy consonant with the present trend of labor legislation, which permits the fullest development of the welfare of all workers and safeguards individual liberty, is that of basing all labor regulations or restrictions upon the nature of the work and not upon the sex of the worker.”
Doris Stevens, Mabel Vernon, Anita Pollitzer, Alva Belmont and other members of the National Woman’s Party will remain in Paris to lobby the delegates when they are outside the conference, and some seem quite supportive. Gabrielle Duchene, a veteran European suffrage leader, said she was happy to see a young and active group like the N.W.P. coming to Europe to strengthen the international women’s movement.
Latest posts by David Dismore (see all)
- Today in Herstory: Birth Control Advocates Press for Better Conditions for Ethel Byrne - January 30, 2015
- Today in Herstory: Margaret Sanger Calls for Repealing Laws Blocking Contraception Access and Information - January 29, 2015
- Today in Herstory: Force-Feedings Continue for Ethel Byrne - January 28, 2015