Abortion

Pennsylvania Court Recognizes Reproductive Autonomy Under State Equal Rights Amendment

On April 20, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued a landmark ruling for reproductive rights, striking down the state’s ban on Medicaid funding for abortion. The court held that the policy violates Pennsylvania Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and the equal protection provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 

The Pennsylvania Equal Rights Amendment, added to the state constitution in 1971, guarantees that equality of rights under the law “shall not be denied or abridged because of the sex of the individual.” The court relied on this provision to find that the state’s Medicaid abortion funding ban unlawfully discriminates against low-income people capable of pregnancy.

The decision came in Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, a case brought by abortion providers. The Women’s Law Project, which has worked tirelessly on this issue, calls it a “decisive victory for reproductive freedom in Pennsylvania.”

Since 1982, Pennsylvania has enforced the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act, a strict ban on the use of Medicaid funds for abortion care. The state’s Medicaid program could only cover abortion in extremely limited circumstances. In all other situations, abortion care had to be paid for entirely out of pocket, even though Medicaid routinely covers prenatal care, childbirth, and other pregnancy-related medical services.

​​This funding ban created a stark economic barrier to abortion care for people across Pennsylvania. For context, around 4 in 10 people who get abortions have an income below the federal poverty level. Since Medicaid serves primarily low-income residents, the restriction effectively denied abortion access to many low-income women. 

The court concluded in its 4–3 ruling that this policy imposed unequal burdens tied directly to pregnancy and reproductive capacity. The majority opinion emphasized that when the government funds medical care connected to pregnancy, it cannot selectively exclude abortion without violating constitutional protections for equality.

The decision builds on a 2024 decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that revived the challenge after lower courts had dismissed it in 2019. That decision overturned decades-old precedent upholding the Medicaid abortion funding ban and allowed the case to proceed under the state ERA.

By grounding this decision in the state Equal Rights Amendment, the court signaled that abortion access is not only a healthcare issue, but also a matter of gender equality. If the ruling stands, Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program could be required to cover abortion services, significantly expanding access for low-income residents who have long been denied care because of cost. 

The decision may still be appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which would have the final say on whether the Medicaid funding ban violates the state constitution. 
The decision already marks a major milestone, demonstrating how state Equal Rights Amendments can serve as powerful tools for protecting reproductive autonomy in a post-Roe landscape.