Eligible Afghan Refugees Denied Access to Resettlement Following Trump’s Executive Orders

On Jan. 20, President Donald Trump introduced a slew of executive orders including the swift signing of an order suspending the resettlement of all refugees to the United States for an indefinite period of time. As a direct effect of this order, more than 1,600 Afghans who had been approved by the U.S. Government to resettle in the United States are having their flights canceled, including family members of active-duty U.S. military personnel.

The decision has led to panic among the prospective refugees, which include groups such as unaccompanied minors awaiting reunification with families in the U.S., as well as Afghans at risk of Taliban retribution for supporting the former U.S.-backed Afghan government. Following the release of the executive order by the White House, refugees approved for resettlement were removed from flights to the U.S. starting Jan. 27.

The executive order, which effectively suspends the United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), has been implemented under the guise of ensuring public safety and national security and counteracting the need for federal aid to manage the “burden” of new arrivals. In reality, this action results in yet another broken promise by the United States as it risks abandoning thousands of Afghan allies that stood by the U.S. and its service members during two decades of conflict–a trend reminiscent of the aftermath of President Biden’s withdrawal of U.S. troops in 2021. 

A majority of the Afghan citizens approved for refugee status had completed background and security checks and were either already scheduled on resettlement flights or in the final stages of approval, all of which was put on halt Monday evening with the signing of the executive order. This not only places Afghan allies in a compromising position but also directly contradicts President Trump’s previous stance that the withdrawal under President Biden was chaotic and it is up to him to “get these folks to safety”.

Since the abrupt and chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, there has been a relocation of nearly 200,000 Afghans to the U.S. However, for the thousands awaiting resettlement and an escape from the Taliban’s rule, President Trump’s recent action has not only cast a shadow of uncertainty and anxiety on their future, but has heightened the possibility of these Afghan refugees facing retaliation from the Taliban.

In Pakistan, the suspension has left approximately 20,000 Afghan refugees in limbo. Many of these individuals, who had fled Afghanistan due to threats from the Taliban, now face the expiration of their visas and continue to ask the Pakistani government to ease visa regulations on humanitarian grounds. 

As many Afghan refugees fear arrest and deportation in Pakistan, the executive order’s repercussions extend beyond Afghanistan’s border countries. In Mexico, numerous Afghan refugees who had traveled there with the hope of entering the United States are now stranded. The abrupt cancellation of asylum appointments has left them in precarious situations, grappling with cultural and language barriers, financial hardships, and an uncertain future. 

The administration’s suspension of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program has ultimately left thousands of Afghan refugees in a perilous state, unable to adjust in their current host countries due to discrimination, social and cultural isolation, and uncertain asylum statuses—and unable to return to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan where their safety is at grave risk. This policy in effect not only abandons those who stood by the U.S. during two decades of conflict but also forces them into a dangerous position, further exacerbating a potential humanitarian crisis and once again leaving Afghans in the dust.

Gender Disparities in the Wake of the Los Angeles Wildfires

Photo by Daniel Lincoln on Unsplash

As increasingly severe natural disasters rage across the globe, such as the ongoing wildfires in Los Angeles, their devastating consequences extend beyond burned landscapes and lost homes. These disasters reveal stark gender disparities in their impact, underscoring why climate change must be viewed through a gender-sensitive lens.

Natural disasters, including wildfires, disproportionately affect women due to systemic inequalities and societal roles which can be exacerbated by climate change. Women are often primary caregivers, managing children, elderly family members, and individuals with disabilities during crises. This caregiving role places them at greater risk when evacuation orders are issued, as seen in the recent Los Angeles wildfires.

Pregnant women, for instance, face severe health challenges when exposed to wildfire smoke, with intensified risks for women of color. Wildfire smoke and fumes can lead to preterm births, low birth weights, and increased maternal stress. These disaster-driven issues highlight not only the critical need for targeted health interventions to protect expectant mothers during these emergencies, but also one of the many ways in which climate change and natural disasters specifically impact women. 

While media and social media coverage of the Los Angeles fires has focused on the lost celebrity mansions, shopping centers, and movie landmarks, the impacted area of Altadena happens to be a historically Black neighborhood in which generations of people of color began to settle during the civil rights era in avoidance of discriminatory housing practices elsewhere. 

Systemic inequalities and historic disinvestment in communities of color such as Altadena amplify the impact of disasters like the Los Angeles wildfires. Women of color are more likely to live in areas with limited access to emergency services, safe housing, and clean air—conditions worsened by the effects of wildfires. These communities often face greater exposure to toxic air pollution from wildfire smoke, compounding health risks for women and their families.

Climate disasters also tend to amplify pre-existing social inequalities. When looking at the impacts of disasters like wildfires, it is evident that women are more likely to suffer from post-disaster poverty and food insecurity. Furthermore, cultural and social norms often limit women’s participation in decision-making processes related to disaster response and climate resilience planning.

For instance, wildfire recovery efforts often focus on infrastructure and resource distribution but fail to address the specific needs of women, such as access to reproductive health services or provisions for menstrual hygiene products in evacuation shelters. Race, immigration status, poverty, place of work, language ability, and mental health conditions are also key factors that impact who has access to knowledge and resources to protect themselves from wildfire smoke while pregnant. This underscores the need for inclusive policies that consider these realities and amplify the needs and voices of women in affected communities.

The ongoing Los Angeles wildfires serve as a powerful reminder of the urgent need to address gender disparities in the face of climate change. By acknowledging and addressing these inequalities, policymakers and organizations can create more equitable solutions that ensure no one is left behind.

As climate disasters become more frequent and severe, the call for inclusive and equitable climate action has never been more pressing. Women’s voices must be at the forefront of these efforts, championing resilience and equality in the face of a rapidly changing world.

>

Support eh ERA banner